Case Studies
AstraZeneca v Cochran: Government’s Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss
Case 1:21-cv-00027-LPS
Document 56
Filed 05/04/21
Pages 1-37
PageIDs #: 3324-3360
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP,
Plaintiff,
v.
XAVIER BECCERA, et al.,
Defendants.
CASE NO.: 1:21-CV-00027-LPS
COMBINED BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS OR,
IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND BRIEF IN
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Table of Contents
- STATUTORY AND REGULATORY BACKGROUND
- DRUG COMPANIES UNILATERIALLY RESTRICT ACCESS TO 340B DISCOUNTS
- COMPANIES SUE TO PREVENT HHS’S ENFORCEMENT OF THE 340B STATUTE
Key Resources
Related Resources
Letter/Comment
Letter/Comment
Case Studies