The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia should vacate the 2022 outpatient prospective payment system rule insofar as it sets a payment rate for 340B hospitals that is lower than the generally applicable payment rate of Average Sales Price plus 6%, AHA told the court yesterday. 

The U.S. Supreme Court in June unanimously ruled in favor of AHA, concluding that HHS’ 2018 and 2019 reimbursement rates for 340B hospitals were unlawful, but left it to the lower court to determine the appropriate remedy. 

The Court should not give HHS “permission to continue violating the law, each and every day, for the remainder of 2022,” AHA wrote. “Here, there is only one way for the government to stop violating the law going forward because the rationale of the Supreme Court’s ruling dictates what HHS must do to fix its violation: reimburse 340B hospitals at the same rate as non-340B hospitals for the remainder of 2022.”

Related News Articles

Headline
Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee Chairman Bill Cassidy, M.D., R-La., today released a report detailing findings from an investigation…
Headline
The AHA April 18 filed friend-of-the-court briefs in three cases in support of Louisiana's 340B contract pharmacy law that prohibits drug companies from…
Headline
A Minnesota state court April 15 dismissed a lawsuit filed by PhRMA challenging the state’s law protecting 340B pricing for contract pharmacy arrangements. The…
Headline
The White House April 15 released an executive order directing federal agencies to undertake a broad range of tasks aimed at reducing the costs of prescription…
Headline
The Department of Health and Human Services said its decision to prevent drug companies from implementing a 340B rebate model “was within its statutory…
Headline
The AHA this week filed a number of friend-of-the-court briefs in cases before the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, urging the court to uphold…