An op-ed by AHA President and CEO Rick Pollack that ran in The Hill the week of July 3 outlines five reasons why site-neutral payment proposals are flawed and should be rejected.  
 
“Congress is considering several pieces of legislation that would impose billions of dollars in additional Medicare payment cuts for services provided by hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs),” Pollack writes. “If enacted, these misguided so-called 'site-neutral' policies would reduce patient access to vital health care services, particularly in rural and other medically underserved communities.” 
 

Related News Articles

Headline
Site-neutral policies fail to recognize that not all sites of care are created equal, writes AHA President and CEO Rick Pollack in a letter to the editor…
Headline
The AHA June 17 participated in a virtual panel discussion hosted by KFF about site-neutral payment. Participants included Ashley Thompson, AHA senior vice…
Headline
The AHA June 14 released a new myth vs. fact document pushing back on several claims some organizations continue to make related to proposals that would impose…
Headline
A March 14 editorial in the Washington Post calling for Congress to enact so-called site-neutral policies is “deeply flawed and incredibly out of touch with…
Blog
A March 14 editorial in the Washington Post calling for Congress to enact so-called site-neutral policies is deeply flawed and incredibly out of touch…
Headline
Billionaire-backed Arnold Ventures is once again pushing its anti-hospital agenda with a new one-page “report” making the Orwellian claim that “site-neutral…