The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia should vacate the 2022 outpatient prospective payment system rule insofar as it sets a payment rate for 340B hospitals that is lower than the generally applicable payment rate of Average Sales Price plus 6%, AHA told the court yesterday. 

The U.S. Supreme Court in June unanimously ruled in favor of AHA, concluding that HHS’ 2018 and 2019 reimbursement rates for 340B hospitals were unlawful, but left it to the lower court to determine the appropriate remedy. 

The Court should not give HHS “permission to continue violating the law, each and every day, for the remainder of 2022,” AHA wrote. “Here, there is only one way for the government to stop violating the law going forward because the rationale of the Supreme Court’s ruling dictates what HHS must do to fix its violation: reimburse 340B hospitals at the same rate as non-340B hospitals for the remainder of 2022.”

Related News Articles

Headline
The Department of Health and Human Services April 18 finalized its rule to establish a 340B Administrative Dispute Resolution process as required under the…
Headline
Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., April 16 updated AHA members on progress to extend telehealth waivers, offering hope that a solution will arise in end-of-year…
Headline
AHA March 26 submitted comments on a discussion draft of the SUSTAIN 340B Act, legislation proposed in the Senate to clarify Congress’ intent in creating the…
Headline
A March 14 editorial in the Washington Post calling for Congress to enact so-called site-neutral policies is “deeply flawed and incredibly out of touch with…
Blog
A March 14 editorial in the Washington Post calling for Congress to enact so-called site-neutral policies is deeply flawed and incredibly out of touch…
Headline
AHA March 12 released a new report from Healthsperien on discounts to 340B hospitals through the 340B Drug Pricing Program relative to drug company revenues…