The Department of Health and Human Services this week in a strongly worded letter to Eli Lilly calls into question recent actions by the drug manufacturer to limit 340B hospital and community clinics’ use of 340B contract pharmacy arrangements. The HHS letter is in response to the drug manufacturer’s request for a pre-advisory enforcement action. 

The letter notes that the Health Resources and Services Administration has already directly expressed significant concerns regarding the drug manufacturer’s new policy and is continuing its review.

The HHS letter states that “Lilly cannot and should not view the absence of any questions from the government as somehow endorsing Lilly’s policy especially when this Department is leading government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic.” 

In addition, HHS warns Eli Lilly that potential litigation is possible if the drug manufacturer “knowingly violates a material condition of the program that results in over-charges to grantees and contractors.”  

Related News Articles

Headline
Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee Chairman Bill Cassidy, M.D., R-La., today released a report detailing findings from an investigation…
Headline
The AHA April 18 filed friend-of-the-court briefs in three cases in support of Louisiana's 340B contract pharmacy law that prohibits drug companies from…
Headline
A Minnesota state court April 15 dismissed a lawsuit filed by PhRMA challenging the state’s law protecting 340B pricing for contract pharmacy arrangements. The…
Headline
The White House April 15 released an executive order directing federal agencies to undertake a broad range of tasks aimed at reducing the costs of prescription…
Headline
The Department of Health and Human Services said its decision to prevent drug companies from implementing a 340B rebate model “was within its statutory…
Headline
The AHA this week filed a number of friend-of-the-court briefs in cases before the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, urging the court to uphold…