The Department of Health and Human Services this week in a strongly worded letter to Eli Lilly calls into question recent actions by the drug manufacturer to limit 340B hospital and community clinics’ use of 340B contract pharmacy arrangements. The HHS letter is in response to the drug manufacturer’s request for a pre-advisory enforcement action. 

The letter notes that the Health Resources and Services Administration has already directly expressed significant concerns regarding the drug manufacturer’s new policy and is continuing its review.

The HHS letter states that “Lilly cannot and should not view the absence of any questions from the government as somehow endorsing Lilly’s policy especially when this Department is leading government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic.” 

In addition, HHS warns Eli Lilly that potential litigation is possible if the drug manufacturer “knowingly violates a material condition of the program that results in over-charges to grantees and contractors.”  

Related News Articles

Headline
The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee June 30 denied a motion for a preliminary injunction by AbbVie in its lawsuit against the state’s…
Headline
The AHA June 27 filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee that defends the state’s 340B contract pharmacy law…
Chairperson's File
Public
Advocacy is a core part of the work of the AHA, protecting and sustaining what hospitals and health systems need to truly care for our communities. We often…
Headline
A U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia judge June 27 ruled against Johnson & Johnson and sided with the Department of Health and Human Services…
Headline
The AHA June 16 released a report showing hospitals that participated in the 340B Drug Pricing Program are not only subject to disproportionately greater…
Chairperson's File
Public
Advocacy is such an important part of what we do as hospitals and health systems — and what the AHA does on behalf of our field — to help ensure that we get…