The Health Resources and Services Administration is expected to propose a further delay in the effective date of a final rule on drug ceiling prices and civil monetary penalties for manufacturers in the 340B drug savings program, according to a notice under review at the Office of Management and Budget. HRSA has delayed the effective date of the rule many times. The most recent delay, which was announced last August, set July 1 as the effective date for the rule. It is not clear what date HRSA will propose for the new effective date. AHA in September opposed any further delay of the rule. "Given the skyrocketing prescription drug price increases that have presented hospitals and patients with remarkable challenges, the 340B program is as critical as ever in helping expand and improve access to comprehensive health care services for vulnerable patients and communities,” said Joanna Hiatt Kim, AHA vice president of payment policy. “We would be very disappointed if another delay of the 340B ceiling price and civil monetary penalties rule is proposed, especially considering that HRSA began rulemaking on this issue eight years ago.”

Related News Articles

Headline
The AHA commented Sept. 15 on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services calendar year 2026 outpatient prospective payment system and ambulatory surgical…
Headline
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Sept. 12 affirmed a Mississippi Court’s decision to deny AbbVie’s request for a preliminary injunction…
Headline
The AHA Sept. 8 urged the Federal Trade Commission and Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice to investigate several drug companies’ concerted efforts…
Headline
The AHA Aug. 27 said the Health Resources and Services Administration should abandon its 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program.“It is a ‘solution’ in search of a…
Headline
The AHA, joined by several other national groups representing 340B hospitals, Aug. 8 urged the Health Resources and Services Administration to extend the…
Headline
The AHA today filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, defending the Department of Health and Human Services’ decision to…