AHASTAT: Paper 'throws cold water' on cross-market theory of hospital merger effects
A new paper by two respected economists “throws cold water” on an untested theory that claims competition falls and prices rise when hospitals in distant geographies combine, writes Melinda Reid Hatton, AHA general counsel and senior vice president, in an AHASTAT blog post. Among its flaw, the theory defines geographic markets too restrictively; fails to account for quality improvements, capital investments and the value of system membership; discounts the ability of health plans to replace the hospitals in their networks; and uses highly aggregated data that obscures any price difference among payers, the economists note.
Related News Articles
Blog
Physicians are increasingly choosing to be employed instead of running their own small practices. Though a far higher percentage of physicians remain in…
Headline
Jon Zifferblatt, M.D., executive vice president and chief strategy officer at West Health, and Diane Wintz, M.D., critical care specialist and medical director…
Headline
The Department of Justice March 27 announced it is launching an Anticompetitive Regulations Task Force to advocate for “the elimination of anticompetitive…
Headline
A report released Jan. 9 by Kaufman Hall highlights hospital and health system merger and acquisition activity from last year. The report said that…
Headline
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce Jan. 13 filed a lawsuit against the Federal Trade Commission, saying changes made by the FTC to premerger notification rules under…
Headline
In this conversation, Dylan Panuska, clinical psychologist and manager of behavioral health integration with Endeavor Health, showcases examples of how…